The authors opinion of the movie RIP is that copy writing should be legal. the music on the Internet should be legal because its already on the Internet and everybody should be able to go and download it and listen to it. The author is young and very bias about copy writing. If the author was older and in a different generation he might have a different view and not be as bias to the situation that the music re mixer is in. This is unfair because people who want the music should be able to go and get it but the law can sue you for lots of money.
The authors biasness supports that copy writing should be legal because it is his business to remix music and to be a DJ but the copy writing laws do not allow him because if he downloads illegal music he will be sued for lots of money it can start from 750 dollars to 750,000 dollars. He is also bias because he doesn't really let the recording company's it is mostly just about them and the bands. The guys that remix the music is trying to prove that copy writing laws should be lifted so that people can get music off of the Internet without being sued for money. An anecdote describes how a lady was sued for money because of copy write infringement from taking music off of the Internet.
I agree with the authors opinion a 100 percent. he wants music to be free to everybody and have no copy writing laws interfering with them and somebody trying to run a business
